In Brief
A woman employee (Chief Manager) challenged her transfer from Indore to Sarsawa, claiming violation of bank circulars. The High Court found the transfer required interference. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that while administrative guidelines are not self-executing vested rights, courts may intervene if a transfer is malafide or ultra vires. However, given four years had elapsed and the employee suffered indignity despite a stay order, the Court directed that she remain in her current posting for one year, after which the bank could reassess posting requirements in accordance with law, prioritizing fair treatment and employee dignity.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.