Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-07-18

Radhey Shyam Pandey vs Kanpur Development Authority

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Radhey Shyam Pandey sought arrears of salary and consequential benefits as a stenographer through a writ petition. The Tribunal allowed his claim, but the High Court set aside the decision, primarily because the State Government—the employing authority responsible for centralised stenographer positions—had not been made a party to the proceedings. The Supreme Court agreed that proper impleadment of all necessary parties is crucial for valid judicial determination. The appeal was allowed and the case was remitted to the High Court with directions to permit the appellant to file additional affidavits and decide the matter after affording both parties full opportunity, preferably within six months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Writ Petition Procedural Regularity Parties to Proceedings

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login