Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-05-11 allowed

Raj Kumar @ Suman vs State (NCT of Delhi)

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

The appellant was convicted of murder and criminal conspiracy based solely on witness testimony that he stood outside with a weapon while others committed the crime. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal and set aside the conviction because the trial court failed to put this only incriminating allegation to the appellant for his explanation under Section 313 CrPC. The Court held that this procedural omission, combined with 27 years of delay and the appellant's prior incarceration of over 10 years, caused such serious prejudice that the conviction was vitiated and could not be cured by remand.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Right to Fair Trial Section 313 CrPC Examination of Accused Criminal Conspiracy Murder Procedural Irregularity Vitiation of Trial Prejudice to Accused Appellate Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login