Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-06-30 allowed

Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Ors vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Chelameswar

In Brief

Persons with disabilities employed at Prasar Bharati challenged government memoranda that denied them 3% statutory reservation in identified Group A and B posts when filled through promotion. The Court held that once posts are identified as suitable for PWD under the 1995 Act, reservation must apply regardless of recruitment mode. The prohibition on promotional reservations from Indra Sawhney applies only to backward classes under Article 16(4), not to PWD, as disability is not a forbidden ground under Article 16(1). The Court declared the memoranda illegal and directed the government to extend 3% reservation to PWD in all identified Group A and B posts irrespective of filling method.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Equal Opportunities Persons with Disabilities Employment Law Reservation Civil Service Administrative Law Broadcasting

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login