Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-24 dismissed

Raju Ambadas Gangekar vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

Captain Vinod Rawat, an Army officer, died from injuries sustained in an assault at a hotel in Ahmednagar in 1988. The trial court acquitted the appellant despite evidence including the victim's dying declaration describing the assailant's clothing, eyewitness testimony from a police constable, and blood-stained clothes recovered from the appellant that matched the victim's blood group. The High Court reversed the acquittal and convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC, sentencing him to five years' imprisonment. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that while appellate courts must respect acquittals, they can reverse them when the trial judgment suffers from clear perversity resulting in miscarriage of justice. Here, the cumulative evidence—eyewitness account, dying declaration, and matching blood evidence—clearly established the appellant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Acquittal and Reversal Appellate Jurisdiction Murder and Assault Eyewitness Testimony Dying Declaration Circumstantial Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login