In Brief
The petitioner sought relief for her daughter, who was detained as an under-trial prisoner, alleging serious misconduct by a jail official (Respondent No.3). The respondent filed a detailed counter-affidavit denying the charges. The Supreme Court held that any police closure report must be based on a complete and effective investigation that fully addresses all positions and assertions raised by the respondent. The Court directed that when the closure report is placed before the Magistrate, notice must be issued to the complainant to allow response. The police were directed to complete their investigation considering all claims before any further action is taken.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.