Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-09-01 allowed

Ramesh Chand (D) through LRS vs Suresh Chand and Anr

Bench: 2 — Aravind Kumar, Sandeep Mehta

In Brief

A father (Kundan Lal) died in 1997 owning property. His son Suresh Chand claimed ownership through an agreement to sell, general power of attorney, receipt, and registered will, all executed on the same date in 1996, but no registered sale deed was executed. The Supreme Court held that none of these documents transferred title. An agreement to sell only creates a right to seek specific performance. A general power of attorney is merely agency, not transfer. A will must be properly proved with attesting witnesses examined. The will was also surrounded by suspicious circumstances (excluding three other children without explanation). Without a registered sale deed, Suresh Chand acquired no title. The property devolves as ancestral property to all legal heirs of Kundan Lal. The appellant's sale of 50% to a second defendant is protected only to that extent.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Property Law Transfer of Property Act Will and Succession Specific Performance Part Performance Doctrine Power of Attorney Title and Possession Evidence and Proof of Documents

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login