Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-10-09 allowed

Ravi Oraon & Ors vs The State of Jharkhand & Ors

Bench: 2 — Dipankar Datta, K.V. Viswanathan

In Brief

Three teachers—Ravi Oraon, Premlal Hembrom, and Surendra Munda—were appointed as Intermediate Trained Teachers in December 2015 but were terminated in October 2016 for allegedly not meeting the 45% marks requirement in their intermediate examination. As Scheduled Tribe members, they claimed entitlement to 5% relaxation, requiring only 40% marks; including vocational subject marks, they exceeded this threshold. The Supreme Court held that Rule 21 (governing merit lists) does not apply to eligibility determination under Rule 4. Vocational subject marks must be included per examination guidelines. The termination violated natural justice as the Department excluded these marks without affording a fresh opportunity to respond. The Court reinstated Ravi and Premlal with full arrears and seniority from original appointment; Surendra's heirs received arrears and deemed 'death-in-harness' status for compassionate relief.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Service Recruitment Natural Justice Scheduled Tribe Reservations Termination of Service Educational Qualifications

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login