Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-03-20 allowed

RESEARCH (ICSSR vs NEETU GAUR & ORS

Bench: 2 — Sudhanshu Dhulia, K. Vinod Chandran

In Brief

The Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) withheld grant-in-aid to the Centre for Research in Rural and Industrial Development (CRRID) for 22 months after discovering irregularities including fake qualifications and improper promotions. CRRID's 17 employees sued for unpaid salaries. The High Court ordered ICSSR to release the grant, reasoning ICSSR had 'deep and pervasive' control via Governing Body nominees. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that nominating one or two members to a 12-member board does not constitute 'deep and pervasive' control. ICSSR validly withheld grants when CRRID violated conditions; grants are discretionary, not a right. CRRID, as employer, bears sole responsibility to pay employee salaries. The Court directed CRRID to pay withheld salaries from its own resources within three weeks or face permanent grant cessation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law - Article 12 Administrative Law Grant-in-Aid Employee Rights Societies Registration Act Public Funding and Control Autonomous Institutions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login