Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-04-13 allowed

Rishabh Chand Jain & Anr vs Ginesh Chandra Jain

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

The suit concerned a declaration that a municipal survey entry regarding disputed land was invalid and not binding. The defendants sought dismissal on grounds of Res Judicata and lack of cause of action. The trial court dismissed the suit without framing the required preliminary issues. The plaintiff argued this was a procedural irregularity making the order non-appealable. The Supreme Court held that the trial court's order, despite procedural defects, was a decree because it conclusively determined the parties' rights on Res Judicata. Such decrees are appealable under Section 96 of the CPC, not revisable under Section 115. The appeal was allowed, and the plaintiff was granted liberty to appeal within six weeks.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Decree Res Judicata Appeal vs Revision Plaint Rejection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login