Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-04 allowed

Rudragouda vs Assistant Commissioner & Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

In this civil appeal, the Supreme Court addressed whether a landowner whose compensation was enhanced under the Land Acquisition Act could be denied interest on the enhanced amount merely because the High Court had committed a judicial error in the earlier proceedings. The High Court had ruled the appellant was entitled to interest but withheld it due to the Court's own mistake. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that once entitled to interest by law, the appellant cannot be deprived of it simply because a court committed an error. The appellant is entitled to interest on the enhanced compensation until realisation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Interest Judicial Error

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login