In Brief
The Supreme Court resolved multiple interlocutory applications arising from contempt proceedings against Sahara Group regarding a restraint order on its assets. The Court clarified that the 2013 restraint order does not prevent consumer redressal commissions from proceeding with pending consumer complaints or executing judgments already rendered. The Court directed Sahara to file a complete list of all properties owned and to make available gold and commodity investments held at spot exchanges to SEBI for adjustment against outstanding dues. Several applications were disposed of with directions, while others were dismissed as withdrawn or not pressed. The matter was adjourned for progress reports on asset sales."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.