Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-13 disposed

Sabu Mathew George vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed whether tech platforms (Microsoft, Google, Yahoo) must comply with India's sex-determination law by blocking prohibited content. The petitioner challenged advertisements for gender determination on search engines. The Court held that platforms cannot be held liable for user-generated content but must cooperate with State Nodal Officers by blocking material that violates Section 22 of the 1994 Act upon notification. Blocking such content does not infringe the right to information or freedom of expression, as restrictions apply only to advertisements promoting prohibited sex selection, not to searches or general information access. The platforms accepted responsibility and committed to appointing experts and complying with directives."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Freedom of Expression Internet Regulation Gender Selection Public Health Law Interim Orders

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login