Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-06-28 partly_allowed

Sanjay Prakash & Ors vs Union of India & Ors

Bench: 1 — <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Five groups of officers from Central Armed Police Forces (CISF, CRPF, ITBP, BSF, SSB) sought Supreme Court approval to challenge High Court orders limiting deputation-based appointments of Indian Police Service (IPS) officers to senior positions in these forces. IPS officers and their association sought to intervene, fearing their deputation opportunities would be eliminated. The Court allowed one IPS officer with direct deputation interest to be impleaded and permitted other IPS officers to intervene, finding they had sufficient interest in the outcome. However, the IPS Association's caveat filing alone did not confer party status; they must separately apply for impleadment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Civil Procedure Administrative Law Service Law Intervention and Impleadment Central Armed Police Forces Deputation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login