Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-09 partly_allowed

Santosh Maruti Mane vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 3 — Sanjay Kumar, Alok Aradhe, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The appellant, a bus driver, hijacked an MSRTC bus after his duty-change request was denied, driving it recklessly for 14–16 km and killing eight people while injuring 36 others. He claimed insanity under Section 84 IPC, citing psychiatric reports suggesting delusions and hallucinations at the time. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and rejection of the insanity defence, finding the High Court's analysis sound. However, recognizing the appellant's mental strain, absence of prior criminality, good prison conduct, and genuine remorse, the Court held this was not a 'rarest of rare case' warranting death. The death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Insanity Defence Death Sentence Sentencing

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login