Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-24 allowed

Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam vs Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh (Dead) Through Lrs. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

After Himachal Pradesh abolished big landed estates in 1955, landholdings exceeding Rs. 125 annual revenue automatically vested in the State, except for personally cultivated land. Late Jagirdar Rajinder Singh's 1011 bighas vested in the State; only 64 bighas remained his. He received compensation three times: under the Abolition Act (1966), Ceiling Act (1980), and Land Acquisition Act (1987)—all for the same vested land. The Supreme Court held that once land vests and compensation is received, no further claims are valid. Fraud vitiates proceedings; the respondent's withdrawal of earlier suits admitting vesting created estoppel. The Court directed refund of all compensation received under the Land Acquisition Act with 12% interest.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Land Reforms Abolition of Estates Ceiling on Land Holdings Fraud Estoppel Compensation Title to Land Vesting of Property State Government Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login