Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-10-09 partly_allowed

Umesh Gupta vs State of Haryana

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered consolidated appeals by the State of Haryana and landowners challenging compensation awarded for land acquired in four villages in 1989. The High Court had set uniform compensation at ₹380 per square yard, relying partly on prior awards from village Judian based on its proximity to Chandigarh. The Court held that when comparative sale deeds exist, they should be the primary basis for valuation, not prior awards (which carry no binding effect between non-parties). The Court rejected using speculative potential value and the annual increase method beyond 4–5 years. Reducing compensation to ₹290 per square yard, the Court partly allowed the State's appeals while dismissing the landowners' appeals.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Evidence - Comparative Exemplars Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login