Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-20 dismissed

Savatram Rampratap Mills vs Radheyshyam s/o Laxminarayan Goenka (D) Thr. LRs. & Anr

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal concerning the eviction of an unauthorized occupant from a government textile mill under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. The key issue was whether proceedings under the Act could be conducted at Mumbai when the mill premises were situated at Akola. The Court held that an Estate Officer's jurisdiction is limited to the local limits specified in the central government's notification under Section 3(b) of the Act. Since the mill was situated at Akola, proceedings must be initiated and held there, not elsewhere. The impugned notices directing the occupant to appear at Mumbai were therefore without jurisdiction and properly quashed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Public Premises Eviction Administrative Law Jurisdiction Estate Officer Powers

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login