Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-01-05 dismissed

SHRI KSHETRIMAYUM MAHESHKUMAR SINGH AND ANR vs THE MANIPUR UNIVERSITY AND ORS

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, Hima Kohli

In Brief

Manipur University, converted to a central institution in 2005, initially adopted national reservation norms (15% SC, 7.5% ST, 27% OBC) under the 2006 Reservation Act from 2009. After the 2012 Amendment, it reverted to pre-2006 state-era percentages (2% SC, 31% ST, 17% OBC). SC candidates challenged this reduction. The Supreme Court upheld the reversion, holding that the 2012 Amendment's proviso to Section 3, applicable to north-eastern institutions, prescribes a single unified formula referencing the pre-2006 baseline. The Court rejected the argument that general clauses could be applied independently, finding the SC/ST and OBC reservation formulae inextricably linked and governed entirely by the proviso's temporal reference to ensure institutional workability and respect regional tribal demography.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Reservation in Education Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Other Backward Classes Central Educational Institutions Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login