Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-09 partly_allowed

State Bank of India and Ors vs Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. and Ors

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

State Bank of India and 13 other banks sought to recover over Rs. 6,203 crores from Kingfisher Airlines and its guarantors through proceedings before a Debt Recovery Tribunal. When the Tribunal was slow to act and the respondent (Kingfisher Airlines' Chairman) attempted to transfer assets, the Supreme Court directed him to disclose all assets in an affidavit. The respondent failed to disclose a bank account in Geneva through which US$ 40 million was transferred to trusts for his children, violating both the Supreme Court's disclosure order and an earlier High Court restraint order against asset transfers. The Supreme Court found the respondent guilty of contempt on both counts and directed him to appear in person for sentencing, noting that restraint orders apply to all property acquired after they were issued.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Court Asset Disclosure Debt Recovery High Court Orders Supreme Court Jurisdiction Banking Law Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login