Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-11-30 allowed

State of Bihar and Ors vs Kirti Narayan Prasad

Bench: 3 — S. Abdul Nazeer

In Brief

The State of Bihar challenged High Court orders directing reinstatement of health service employees whose appointments had been found irregular or illegal. The employees, appointed by civil surgeons without proper recruitment procedures, claimed the right to regularisation based on ten years of service. The Supreme Court held that illegal appointments—made through forged documents, on non-sanctioned posts, without open competition, or by incompetent authorities—cannot be regularised even after long tenure. Only irregular but validly-qualified appointments in sanctioned posts qualify for the Umadevi exception. Void ab initio appointments confer no civil servant status and require no disciplinary proceedings for termination.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Public Employment Constitutional Law Recruitment and Selection Regularisation of Service Illegal Appointments Natural Justice

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login