Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-31 partly_allowed

State of Haryana and another etc vs Mohinder Singh and others etc

Bench: 2 — Jagdish Singh Khehar

In Brief

The State of Haryana challenged a High Court judgment that ordered regular pay scales for conductors and drivers who had been initially engaged on consolidated salary. While the Supreme Court affirmed that the High Court correctly applied the principle of equal pay for equal work and that the statutory rules were unconstitutional to the extent they discriminated in wage payments, it modified the arrears order. Following the constitutional bench precedent in Umadevi, arrears were limited to payment from the date of the High Court judgment (1 April 2013) rather than from the date of filing petitions or demand, to respect principles of limitation in monetary claims.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Service Law Equal Pay for Equal Work Arrears Article 309

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login