Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-09-26 allowed

State of Madhya Pradesh vs Chhaakki Lal and Another

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

On 20 February 2006, four villagers were murdered in daylight in Madhya Pradesh. The sole eyewitness, Kesar Bai (an elderly woman), identified the accused as Chhaakki Lal and his son Akhilesh. The trial court convicted both under Section 302 IPC and imposed death penalty. The High Court acquitted them, finding the witness unreliable due to contradictions in her evidence. The Supreme Court allowed the state's appeal, holding that minor discrepancies in an eyewitness's testimony—especially a grief-stricken elderly woman—do not undermine conviction when corroborated by medical and ballistic evidence. Restoring conviction but substituting life imprisonment for death penalty, considering the passage of time since the 2006 incident."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Witness Testimony Murder Appeal Against Acquittal Credibility of Witness Ballistic Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login