Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-13 partly_allowed

State of U.P vs Raghuvir and Anr. etc. etc

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

On 30 July 2003, Lallu Singh was shot and killed by four accused persons in an ambush. Two eye-witnesses consistently identified the shooters. A gun recovered from one accused (Prem Yadav) matched, by ballistic examination, cartridges found at the scene. The trial court convicted all four under Section 302 IPC. The High Court acquitted them, citing delay in lodging the FIR and alleged procedural defects. The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal: it confirmed the conviction of Prem Yadav (the gun owner), holding the ballistic evidence admissible and credible despite procedural non-compliance, and the FIR delay adequately explained. The convictions of the other three accused were set aside for lack of corroborating evidence beyond eye-witness testimony.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Evidence Ballistic Evidence Eye-witness Testimony Delay in FIR Conspiracy

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login