Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-03-21 partly_allowed

State of Maharashtra and another vs Madhukar Antu Patil and another

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah

In Brief

The respondent was initially appointed in 1982 as a Technical Assistant on work-charge basis and later absorbed in 1989 as a Civil Engineering Assistant in a different post with different pay scale. The State later downgraded his pay and pension, arguing the first Time Bound Promotion (TBP) should be calculated from 1989, not 1982. The High Court and Tribunal had set aside this downgrade. The Supreme Court partly allowed the State's appeal, holding TBP eligibility runs from 1989 (absorption date) but directed no recovery of amounts already paid, as the original grant was approved by Government and not due to employee misrepresentation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Service Law Pension Time Bound Promotion Pay Revision

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login