Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-25 dismissed

State of U.P. & Anr. etc vs Anand Kumar Yadav & Ors. etc

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel, Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment quashing the State of Uttar Pradesh's attempt to regularize 1.78 lakh Shiksha Mitras (para-teachers) as Assistant Teachers. The Court held that under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, Section 23, all teachers must possess minimum statutory qualifications laid down by the NCTE, which cannot be relaxed by State action. Shiksha Mitras were appointed on contractual basis without statutory qualifications, did not follow recruitment rules, and cannot be regularized as teachers. The Court emphasized that the fundamental right to education means quality education by duly qualified teachers. While Shiksha Mitras may continue as contractors, they must acquire statutory qualifications to be appointed as regular teachers and may be given age relaxation and weightage for experience in future recruitments.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Education Law Right to Free and Compulsory Education Teacher Qualifications Public Employment Administrative Law Statutory Construction Ultra Vires

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login