Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-01-14 remanded

State of U.P. & Ors vs All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Association

Bench: 3 — Arijit Pasayat, Rekha Sharma

In Brief

The State of U.P. challenged a High Court order directing establishment of five additional Consumer Fora in Uttar Pradesh. The Supreme Court found that infrastructure, staffing, and service-condition deficiencies at Consumer Commissions and District Fora constitute a country-wide problem requiring systematic reform. Rather than examine each State individually, the Court established a three-member Committee of former judges and a government secretary to investigate and recommend remedies across all States on infrastructure, vacancies, eligibility conditions, administrative powers, and staffing norms. The Committee will visit States, consult officials, prepare roadmaps, and report back to Court for implementation oversight and further directions.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Dispute Resolution Mechanism Public Interest Litigation Administrative Law Infrastructure and Facilities

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login