In Brief
In this capital sentencing review case, the Supreme Court found the petitioner guilty of murdering his partner Anita and her four children, whose bodies were discovered in a pond in Maharashtra in 2007. While upholding the conviction based on circumstantial evidence (motive, last-seen testimony, and an extra-judicial confession), the Court identified two significant errors in its own prior appeal judgment: reliance on an extra-judicial confession that the trial court had rejected, and an unsupported observation about facial injuries. Applying the doctrine of prudence in capital cases, the Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment without remission, holding that given the exclusively circumstantial evidence and these errors, life imprisonment should not have been foreclosed as an alternative sentence."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.