Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-14 allowed

SUDHIR KUMAR vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

Bench: 2 — N.V. Ramana, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

This case involved criminal appeals challenging a High Court's modification of a murder conviction. The State of Haryana prosecuted Surender @ Monu for murdering Balwan Singh with an iron rod during a community dispute. The Trial Court convicted him under Section 302 IPC (murder), but the High Court reduced the conviction to Section 304 Part-I (culpable homicide). The Supreme Court held that medical evidence of three critical head injuries, including a 22 cm wound with ruptured blood vessels and extensive haemorrhage, clearly established the accused's intention to commit murder. The Court restored the Section 302 conviction and life imprisonment, holding that the nature, location, and force of the injuries demonstrated premeditated intent, not mere culpable homicide.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Culpable Homicide Sentencing Medical Evidence Intention

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login