Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-12-02 other

Swaraj Abhiyan and Anr vs Union of India and Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Three writ petitions were filed by Swaraj Abhiyan (an unregistered organization), T.S. Singhdeo (an opposition leader), and another petitioner, raising concerns regarding alleged violations of fundamental rights under Article 32 of the Constitution. The Attorney General challenged the maintainability of these petitions, arguing that an unregistered organization cannot petition, that a political leader's petition lacks locus, and that politically-motivated litigation disguised as public interest litigation falls outside Article 32's scope. The Court reserved judgment on maintainability and other grounds, directing the parties to file written submissions and listing the matter for hearing on 10 January 2017."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Writ Petition Public Interest Litigation Locus Standi Fundamental Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login