Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-20 allowed

Syndicate Bank vs Estate Officer and Manager (Recoveries) & Ors

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

M/s United Auto Tractor Ltd. obtained 51 acres of land in Andhra Pradesh with an agreement permitting mortgage to secure bank loans. After paying 50% of the cost, the company mortgaged the land to Syndicate Bank by depositing the letter of allotment and related documents. The Government later transferred control to APIIC, which cancelled the allotment of 25 acres but left 26 acres with the company. When the company defaulted, the bank sought to sell all 51 acres. The High Court held the mortgage invalid due to absence of a registered sale deed. The Supreme Court held the State and APIIC were estopped from challenging the mortgage validity, given prior express permission and their subsequent conduct. The Court awarded the bank Rs.38,95,51,163/- from auction proceeds with 12% interest per annum, with the balance going to the Telangana Industrial Infrastructure Ltd.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Mortgages and Charges Equitable Mortgages Estoppel Debt Recovery Industrial Land Allotment Public Auction Bank Recovery

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login