In Brief
A man (Taijuddin) was convicted of murder and conspiracy in connection with a land dispute that resulted in a death. The victim was chased by a mob to a house, which was then attacked and the body disposed of in a river. Taijuddin's only alleged role was pointing out where the victim was hiding. The Supreme Court acquitted him, holding that hearsay testimony from a witness who never saw the incident could not establish his participation in the unlawful assembly. The victim's family members never identified him, and his mere act of pointing out a location—without weapons or direct assault—did not prove he shared the mob's common intent to kill under Section 149 IPC. The Court emphasized that courts must guard against implicating innocent bystanders based on weak or inconsistent evidence.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.