In Brief
This case involved multiple challenges to domicile/residence-based reservation policies for post-graduate medical course admissions. The Supreme Court declined to make a final determination on the constitutional validity of such reservations under Article 14. Instead, it found the issue required examination by a Larger Bench, noting that while a blanket prohibition may not work for State Quota seats (as all admissions are merit-based via NEET ranks), the precise constitutional permissibility and implementation modalities needed authoritative resolution, especially for States with limited medical colleges.">
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.