Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-12-13 allowed

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE vs M JEYANTHI

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

A police constable in Tamil Nadu resigned in June 2017 but attempted to withdraw her resignation a month later, claiming the acceptance was invalid. The High Court allowed her appeal, holding that a 90-day notice requirement meant she could withdraw within that period. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that once a resignation is formally accepted by the appointing authority, the employee loses all right to withdraw it. The notice period requirement applies to the act of tendering resignation, not to creating a window for withdrawal after acceptance. Upon acceptance, service ceases immediately.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Employment Law Government Servants Police Service Resignation and Withdrawal Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login