Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-11 dismissed

Tripurari Sharan and Anr vs Ranjit Kumar Yadav & Ors

Bench: 2 — Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

In Brief

The Supreme Court affirmed that a Meritorious Reserved Candidate (MRC)—a reserved category student who qualifies on general merit—may choose a seat earmarked for the reserved category to secure admission in a college of preference. However, for computing the reservation percentage, the MRC is deemed admitted as a general category candidate, not a reserved candidate. When an MRC opts for a reserved seat, the general seat he vacates is filled by the lowest-ranking affected reserved candidate, maintaining the 50% reservation cap. The Court distinguished UPSC service selections (governed by Ramesh Ram) from medical admissions (governed by Ritesh R. Sah), holding that different rules apply to each context."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Reservation Medical Education Meritorious Reserved Candidate Equal Protection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login