Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-03-16 allowed

UDAYAKUMAR vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, Sanjay Karol

In Brief

Udayakumar was convicted of murdering Purushothaman under Section 302 IPC, while being acquitted of conspiracy under Section 120-B. The other two accused were acquitted of both charges. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal, holding that when the High Court disbelieved the conspiracy theory and acquitted the principal conspirators on the same evidence, there was no basis to convict Udayakumar. The sole eyewitness identification was materially contradicted and unreliable, with no independent corroboration. The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, requiring the Court to grant the benefit of doubt and quash the conviction.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Murder Eyewitness Identification Conspiracy Criminal Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login