Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-13 partly_allowed

Union of India & Ors vs C. Girija & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

The petitioner C. Girija sought inclusion in a 2001 promotion panel for the position of Assistant Personnel Officer (APO) under the Southern Railway's 30% Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE) quota. She had applied for 4 unreserved vacancies but was not selected; the 5th vacancy was reserved for SC candidates. She filed a representation only in 2007, over six years later. The Tribunal and High Court allowed her claim, but the Supreme Court held that her stale claim was barred by delay and laches and should not have been entertained. However, the Court allowed her retiral benefits with interest, dismissing the Railway's appeals while directing payment of retirement dues.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Service Law Promotion Reservation Administrative Law Delay and Laches Equality

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login