Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-13 partly_allowed

Union of India & Ors vs C. Girija & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

C. Girija, an Office Superintendent, applied for promotion to Assistant Personnel Officer under 30% limited competitive examination (LDCE) in 1999. She was not selected from four unreserved vacancies, though a SC candidate was promoted. Over six years later, in 2007, she challenged the selection, claiming the reserved post should have been unreserved. The Tribunal and High Court had sided with her, but the Supreme Court reversed this, holding her claim was barred by delay and laches. The Court found no legal infirmity in the vacancy allocation. However, the Court directed payment of her full retiral benefits with 8% interest from one month after retirement, as retirement could be processed independently of promotion disputes.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Service Law Promotion and Reservation Delay and Laches Administrative Law Service Matters

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login