Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-20 partly_allowed

Union of India & Ors vs Tata Tea Co. Ltd. & Anr

Bench: 2 — Ashok Bhushan

In Brief

Tata Tea Co., which cultivates tea (agricultural) and manufactures it industrially, challenged Section 115-O of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which imposes additional tax on dividends declared by domestic companies. The petitioner argued Parliament lacked power to tax dividends derived from agricultural income, which is exclusively taxable by States. The Supreme Court held Section 115-O is valid and within Parliament's competence under Entry 82 of List I (taxes on income other than agricultural income). Although a company's underlying profits may be partly agricultural, when declared as dividend, it becomes investment income arising from shareholder contractual relations, not agricultural income. The Court set aside the Calcutta High Court's limitation restricting tax to 40% of dividends, holding Section 115-O applies fully as enacted without judicial modification."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Tax Law Federalism Legislative Competence Income Tax Dividends

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login