Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-03 allowed

Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank & Ors vs Narendra Kumar Sinha

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A bank dismissed an employee on three charges of misconduct after a departmental inquiry found all three charges proved. The employee's writ petition to the High Court succeeded in part—the Single Judge found one charge not proved but failed to examine the other two. The Division Bench remanded the case to the Disciplinary Authority for fresh consideration. The Supreme Court held that the Single Judge must independently examine and record findings on all charges; selective scrutiny violates judicial obligation. The case was remanded to the Single Judge to decide the writ petition on full merits, not to the administrative body. The bank's appeal was allowed.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Employment Law Service Law Dismissal Administrative Law Departmental Enquiry Judicial Review High Court Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login