Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-04-19 dismissed

V G Jagdishan vs M/s. Indofos Industries Limited

Bench: 2 — M. R. Shah, B. V. Nagarathna

In Brief

A workman employed, working, and terminated at Ghaziabad later moved to Delhi and sent a demand notice to the company's head office there. He filed an industrial dispute complaint before the Delhi Labour Court. The Labour Court held it lacked territorial jurisdiction, as the cause of action arose at Ghaziabad. The High Court and this Court affirmed the decision. The Supreme Court held that territorial jurisdiction is determined by where employment, work, and termination occurred, not by the location of the head office or post-termination conduct. The Labour Court properly decided the jurisdictional issue as a preliminary matter.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour and Industrial Law Territorial Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Preliminary Issue

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login