Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-11-24 partly_allowed

Vijender alias Bijjo vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Vijender was convicted along with a co-accused for murdering his sister Anita during a domestic dispute. The co-accused used a knife to inflict fatal injuries; Vijender attacked her with a wooden plank (thapki). Medical evidence showed the knife wounds were individually capable of causing death. The Supreme Court found no evidence of Vijender's intent to kill—he went unarmed, picked up a handy wooden plank, and the eye-witness did not testify to any expressed intention to kill. The Court converted his conviction from murder (Section 302) to culpable homicide not amounting to murder (Section 304 Part II), finding he caused death with knowledge of its likelihood but without intent. His sentence remained ten years imprisonment, which he had already served."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder and Homicide Penal Code—Section 302 and 304 Intention and Knowledge Joint Liability

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login