In Brief
A judicial officer compulsorily retired on unproven corruption allegations sought relief. The High Court found no corruption proved but refused reinstatement, citing his eight-year absence and age. The Supreme Court held that once charges are cleared, the officer's honour and dignity require restoration, but reinstatement was impossible as he had passed superannuation age. The Court awarded a lump-sum compensation of Rs. 20 lakhs instead of back-wages to avoid protracted litigation over salary computation and as just relief in the circumstances.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.