Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-11 dismissed

Anjali Arora and Others vs Union of India and Another

Bench: 2 — Navin Sinha

In Brief

Petitioners working as Junior Stenographers at the National Institute sought equal pay with Senior Stenographers, relying on a prior Supreme Court judgment that had granted such parity to others. The Court dismissed the petition, holding that parity in pay applies only to identically situated employees. Although both groups acquired similar pay scales through promotion and ACP/MACP, the petitioners held lower substantive posts and were promoted to higher grades after the relevant pay commissions had concluded. The petitioners were therefore not similarly situated to warrant equal treatment under the regulatory framework governing the Institute."}]

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Civil Service Parity in Pay Administrative Law Government Employment

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login