Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-11 dismissed

ANJALI ARORA vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha

In Brief

Petitioners employed at the National Institute sought mandamus under Article 32 of the Constitution for parity in pay scale, claiming they were similarly situated to employees benefited in an earlier Supreme Court judgment (Yogeshwar Prasad). The Court held that parity applies only to employees in comparable positions holding similar posts. Since petitioners held lower posts (Junior Stenographer/Grade-II) and were promoted to higher grades only after the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions took effect, they were not similarly situated as the earlier beneficiaries. The petition was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Service Matters Pay and Allowances Parity Public Employment Central Pay Commission Article 32

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login