Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-01-02 allowed

AND OTHERS vs GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

Bench: 2 — B.R. Gavai, K. V. Viswanathan

In Brief

Landowners in Bengaluru whose properties were acquired in 2003 for the Bengaluru-Mysuru Infrastructure Corridor Project sought compensation determined at 2019 market value, given a 22-year delay in issuing awards. The High Court quashed an award that had shifted the valuation date to 2011 (the SLAO lacked power to do so), but directed compensation be determined at 2003 rates. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that in cases of inordinate state-caused delay, the Court may exercise powers under Article 142 to shift the valuation date to when the award is actually passed, ensuring fair compensation that reflects the true value of the property and respects the constitutional right under Article 300-A.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Article 300-A Property Rights Constitutional Law Administrative Law Eminent Domain Delay in Proceedings Public Purpose Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login