Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-25 allowed

Special Land Acquisition Officer, Kiadb, Mysore & Anr vs Anasuya Bai (D) by LRs. & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that the Land Acquisition Act, 2013's lapse provisions do not apply to land acquired under Karnataka's Industrial Areas Development Act, which is a self-contained statute. Reversing the High Court, the Court found that even though an advisory committee had fixed compensation at Rs. 6,50,000 per acre, the landowner had not given written consent as required. The Court remitted the matter for the authorities to determine compensation afresh under KIAD Act procedures, either by obtaining the landowner's consent or by referring the matter to the Deputy Commissioner. No time-bar applied since Section 11A of the old Act does not govern KIAD acquisitions.">

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Constitutional Law Administrative Law Compensation Industrial Development

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login