Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-05 dismissed

Chhote Lal Nishad (D) vs Ravinder Kumar Srivastava

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

A tenant challenged a High Court order that had quashed the dismissal of an eviction petition filed by a landlord-advocate, arguing the High Court should have issued notice to him before doing so. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that no prejudice was caused as the tenant would have a full opportunity to be heard in the fresh proceedings. The Court affirmed that a landlord's bona fide need for self-occupation and professional use of the property is a material consideration in eviction cases under the Rent Control Act.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Eviction Law Tenant and Landlord Rent Control Housing Law Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login