Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-09-05 partly_allowed

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus., Surat-I vs Vandana Art Prints Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Central Excise Department had raised three duty demands against a printing company, totalling Rs. 99,83,882. The lower adjudicating authority confirmed all demands and imposed penalties equal to each demand. On appeal, the Tribunal set aside one demand of Rs. 79,39,162 but upheld two demands totalling Rs. 40,44,720. However, the Tribunal reduced the total penalty to only Rs. 20 lakhs. The Supreme Court held that under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, penalty must equal the duty determined. Since the Tribunal upheld duty of Rs. 40,44,720, the penalty must also be Rs. 40,44,720. The appeal was partly allowed, with the respondent required to pay the additional penalty balance within two months."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Law Taxation Administrative Law Penalty Central Excise Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login