Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-09-05 partly_allowed

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus., Surat-I vs Vandana Art Prints Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — 2

In Brief

The Department of Central Excise raised three duty demands against the respondent company: Rs. 26,94,890/-, Rs. 13,49,830/-, and Rs. 79,39,162/-. The Tribunal upheld the first two (totalling Rs. 40,44,720/-) but quashed the third. However, it reduced the penalty to Rs. 20 lakhs. The Supreme Court held that under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, the penalty must equal the duty so determined. Since the upheld duty was Rs. 40,44,720/-, the penalty must also be that amount. The Court partly allowed the appeal, directing the respondent to pay the correct penalty of Rs. 40,44,720/-, adjusting the Rs. 20 lakhs already paid, with the balance due in two months.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Central Excise Penalty Duty Determination Tax Law Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login